ActionAid International - Your gift could change a life forever: click here to donate now
HOME ABOUT US WHERE WE WORK WHAT WE DO TAKING ACTION MEDIA CONTACT DONATE NOW
Image
image image
image
image

Gun rule or rule of law?

From Gujarat 2002 to Nandigram 2007, concern is mounting over incidents of police firing on citizens. But where does accountability lie? A competition launched by ActionAid and Gujarat National Law University is seeking answers.

The ‘Manthan 2007’ competition invites law students to undertake legal research on police firing and state accountability.

In the firing line

In India, famously described by UN diplomat Shashi Tharoor as land of a “million mutinies”, competing political, social and economic interests are often at loggerheads.

India may be shining for some, with both ideas and opportunities, but putting profits before people is increasingly pushing India’s poorest to the margins.

Free market policies have also made blue collar workers in both organized and un-organized sectors more vulnerable to the muscle of management.

As they demand their rights and a place in the economy, the most marginalised – dalits, tribals, agricultural labourers and women workers – end up in the firing line.

Politics thriving on hate and ‘othering’ of communities both deflects attention from wider social ills and creates further targets.

“In 2002, the police were hand in glove with the right-wing mob that attacked Muslims in Gujarat,” says Javed Ameer, project coordinator for ActionAid.

“In Tonk in Rajasthan, a farmers’ rally became the target. In Kalingar Nagar it was tribals. What is state accountability in the event of police firing?” he asks.

Should the police fire at all?

The National Human Rights Commission has guidelines for what are known as ‘encounter killings’ and ‘custodial rape and custodial murder’. The question is whether there is any legal justification for police firing at all, especially on peaceful protest marches or sit-ins.

Why legal research?

The question demands attention and offers legal minds opportunity for closer and comprehensive scrutiny of the killing of a human being by the police.

Under the microscope will be:

  • The right of individuals and communities to assemble as enshrined in Article 19 of the Constitution of India
  • The right to protest, or even to gather and rally around each other for self defence
  • And the fundamental right to life, protected in Article 21 of the Constitution.

“Police do have the power to use force even to shoot, but only in extreme circumstances and while maintaining public order. Legal research can help to draw the line between ensuring the ‘due process’ of law and observance of respect for right to life and deprivation of life by state agencies with decision to shoot,” says Professor Krisna Deva Rao of Gujarat National Law University.

Research papers from law students taking part in the competition will help evolve guidelines to objectively ascertain if police firing is necessary and proportional.

Click here for competition entry rules. 

 

Image
ActionAid country selector

READ MORE:

Image
Image
         
     
Image